100 Mostly Small But Expressive Interjections

100 Mostly Small But Expressive Interjections 100 Mostly Small But Expressive Interjections 100 Mostly Small But Expressive Interjections By Mark Nichol They often seem disreputable, like sullen idlers loitering in a public thoroughfare, but they actually do a lot of hard work and are usually persnickety about the tasks to which they are put. They are interjections one class of them, anyway: those lacking etymological origins but packed with meaning. But how do you know how to distinguish similar ones or spell them, for that matter? Here’s an incomplete inventory of interjections (not including variations of actual words such as yeah for yes or onomatopoeic echoes of externally produced sounds like boom): Ack communicates disgust or dismissal. Ah can denote positive emotions like relief or delight (generally, pronounced with a long a). Aha signals triumph or surprise, or perhaps derision. Ahem is employed to gain attention. Argh, often drawn out with additional h’s, is all about frustration. Aw can be dismissive or indicative of disappointment, or, when drawn out, expressive of sympathy or adoration. Aye denotes agreement. Bah is dismissive. Blah communicates boredom or disappointment. Blech (or bleah or bleh) implies nausea. Boo is an exclamation to provoke fright. Boo-hoo is imitative of crying and is derisive. Boo-ya (with several spelling variants) is a cry of triumph. Bwah-hah-hah (variously spelled, including mwah-hah-hah) facetiously mimics the stereotypical archvillain’s triumphant laugh. D’oh is the spelling for the muttering accompanying Homer Simpson’s trademark head-slapping self-abuse. Duh derides someone who seems dense. Eek indicates an unpleasant surprise. Eh, with a question mark, is a request for repetition or confirmation of what was just said; without, it is dismissive. Er (sometimes erm) plays for time. Ew denotes disgust, intensified by the addition of one or more e’s and/or w’s. Feh (and its cousin meh) is an indication of feeling underwhelmed or disappointed. Gak is an expression of disgust or distaste. Ha expresses joy or surprise, or perhaps triumph. Ha-ha (with possible redoubling) communicates laughter or derision. Hamana-hamana, variously spelled, and duplicated as needed, implies speechless embarrassment. Hardy-har-har, or har-har repeated as needed, communicates mock amusement. Hee-hee is a mischievous laugh, while its variants heh and heh-heh (and so on) can have a more derisive connotation. Hey can express surprise or exultation, or can be used to request repetition or call for attention. Hist signals the desire for silence. Hm, extended as needed, suggests curiosity, confusion, consternation, or skepticism. Hmph (also hrmph or humph) indicates displeasure or indignation. Ho-ho is expressive of mirth, or (along with its variant oh-ho) can indicate triumph of discovery. Ho-hum signals indifference or boredom. Hubba-hubba is the vocal equivalent of a leer. Huh (or hunh) is a sign of disbelief, confusion, or surprise, or, with a question mark, is a request for repetition. Hup, from the sound-off a military cadence chant, signals beginning an exerting task. Hurrah (also hoorah, hooray, and hurray, and even huzzah) is an exclamation of triumph or happiness. Ick signals disgust. Lah-de-dah denotes nonchalance or dismissal, or derision about pretension. Mm-hmm, variously spelled, is an affirmative or corroborating response. Mmm, extended as needed, conveys palatable or palpable pleasure. Mwah is suggestive of a kiss, often implying unctuous or exaggerated affection. Neener-neener, often uttered in a series of three repetitions, is a taunt. Now (often repeated â€Å"Now, now†) is uttered as an admonition. Oh is among the most versatile of interjections. Use it to indicate comprehension or acknowledgment (or, with a question mark, a request for verification), to preface direct address (â€Å"Oh, sir!†), as a sign of approximation or example (â€Å"Oh, about three days†), or to express emotion or serves as a response to a pain or pleasure. (Ooh is a variant useful for the last two purposes.) Oh-oh (or alternatives in which oh is followed by various words) is a warning response to something that will have negative repercussions. Olà ©, with an accent mark over the e, is borrowed from Spanish and is a vocal flourish to celebrate a deft or adroit maneuver. Ooh, with o’s repeated as needed, conveys interest or admiration, or, alternatively, disdain. Ooh-la-la is a response to an attempt to impress or gently mocks pretension or finery. Oops (and the jocular diminutive variation oopsie or oopsy and the variant whoops) calls attention to an error or fault. Ouch (or ow, extended as needed) signals pain or is a response to a harsh word or action. Oy, part of Yiddish expressions such as oy gevalt (equivalent to â€Å"Uh-oh†), is a lament of frustration, concern, or self-pity. Pff, extended as needed, expresses disappointment, disdain, or annoyance. Pfft, or phfft, communicates abrupt ending or departure or is a sardonic dismissal akin to pff. Phew, or pew, communicates disgust, fatigue, or relief. (Phooey, also spelled pfui, is a signal for disgust, too, and can denote dismissal as well. PU and P.U. are also variants.) Poof is imitative of a sudden disappearance, as if by magic. Pooh is a contemptuous exclamation. Pshaw denotes disbelief, disapproval, or irritation or, alternatively, communicates facetious self-consciousness. Psst calls for quiet. Rah, perhaps repeated, signals triumph. Shh (extended as necessary) is an imperative for silence. Sis boom bah is an outdated encouraging cry, most likely to be used mockingly now. Tchah communicates annoyance. Tsk-tsk and its even snootier variant tut-tut are condemnations or scoldings; the related sound tch is the teeth-and-tongue click of disapproval. Ugh is an exclamation of disgust. Uh is an expression of skepticism or a delaying tactic. Uh-huh indicates affirmation or agreement. Uh-oh signals concern or dismay. Uh-uh is the sound of negation or refusal. Um is a placeholder for a pause but also denotes skepticism. Va-va-voom is an old-fashioned exclamation denoting admiration of physical attractiveness. Whee is an exclamation of excitement or delight. Whew is a variant of phew but can also express amazement. Whoa is a call to halt or an exclamation of surprise or relief. Whoop-de-doo and its many variants convey mocking reaction to something meant to impress. Woo and woo-hoo (and variations like yahoo, yee-haw, and yippee) indicate excitement. (Woot, also spelled w00t among an online in-crowd, is a probably ephemeral variant.) Wow expresses surprise. Yay is a congratulatory exclamation. (Not to be confused with yeah, a variant of yes.) Yikes is an expression of fear or concern, often used facetiously. Yo-ho-ho is the traditional pirates’ refrain. Yoo-hoo attracts attention. Yow, or yowza, is an exclamation of surprise or conveys being impressed. Yuck (also spelled yech or yecch) signals disgust. (Not to be confused with yuk, a laugh.) Yum, or yummy, is a response to the taste of something delicious and, by extension, the sight of an attractive person. Zoinks is an expression of surprise or amazement popularized by the cartoon character Shaggy, of Scooby Doo fame. Zowie, often in combination following wowie, a variant of wow, expresses admiration or astonishment. Want to improve your English in five minutes a day? Get a subscription and start receiving our writing tips and exercises daily! Keep learning! Browse the Vocabulary category, check our popular posts, or choose a related post below:Definitely use "the" or "a"15 Great Word GamesWhat the heck are "learnings"?

The Most Famous Wildfire Photograph Ever Taken

The Most Famous Wildfire Photograph Ever Taken Some consider the image shown, taken by an observant wildland firefighter, to be one of the most beautiful photographs of both wildfire  and wildlife taking refuge. The photo  was taken on August 6,  2000, by John McColgan who was a fire behavior expert working under a  cooperative agreement with the  Bureau of Land Management (BLM)  and attached to an Alaskan Type I Incident Management Team on a Montana wildfire.​ McColgan says he was at the perfect spot with his Kodak DC280 digital camera when fire conditions and wildlife activity combined to create his image. The pic was saved as just another image file in the new type of digital camera.   McColgan finished his work for the BLM and returned to his home in Fairbanks, Alaska. He could not be found for days after one of those pictures turned viral and spread quickly over the Internet.   One of his elk and fire snapshots has fast become one of the most downloaded environmental photos of wildlife and wildfire on the Internet. Rob Chaney, a  reporter for the  Montana Missoulian  suggested that there were multiple reasons this photo was so great. Here are some of the comments reported:   Best darned elk photo Ive ever seen.Best darned fire photo Ive ever seen.Best darned photo, period, Ive ever seen. From the Official Record The famous photo was taken on a Sunday, in the late evening where several fires burned together near Sula, Montana (population 37) and turned into one large 100,000-acre wildfire. McColgan just happened to be standing on a bridge crossing the East Fork of the  Bitterroot River  in the  Sula  Complex of the  Bitterroot National Forest  in the state of  Montana where he took what is now called his elk bath digital Image. McColgan was employed by the Alaska Fire service and was on loan to Montana and acting as an expert on wildfire behavior. McColgan just happened to be a contract fire analyst with a new camera and took digital pictures of two elk who escaped the fire by wading in the Bitterroot River. No big deal. As a natural resource professional, McColgan understood both wildfire and wildlife.  When asked about the elk, he assured that they know where to go, where their safe zones are...a lot of wildlife did get driven down there to the river. There were some bighorn sheep there. A small deer was standing right underneath me, under the bridge. McColgan completed his assignment and left for home. The Search for McColgan The digital image he took was sent from one person to another person and according to the Montana Missoulian within about 24 hours the elk photo had world-wide-webbed its way across the West. For about a week now, theres been a medium-size manhunt underway across the West. The man everyones been hunting for is John McColgan of Fairbanks. The Nation and the World were sending emails and making phone calls for weeks to find out just who took the images of the wildfire and wildlife. It was the newspaper  Missoulian in Montana who finally solved the mystery and tracked McColgan down. He had indeed been in Montana and was now in Fairbanks attending the birth of his son, where the paper finally found him and where he told reporter Rob Chaney that he had taken the picture. I just happened to be in the right place at the right time.  McColgan confirmed that he had been in fire protection for  years  and that this particular fire ranked in the top three  extreme fire behavior  events he had ever seen.   Rob Chaney in response to the photo wrote that many people have never even seen an elk. Most of those who have, even those whove seen thousands of them, never get to see an image like this. Most people dont get to see a fire like this, either. Thanks to McColgan and Rob Chaney, millions of people have seen this stunning image. McColgans image went viral and eventually was picked as a Time Magazine favorite.